AECH1100 Environmental Awareness & Ethics-1

Qualified Writers
Rated 4.9/5 based on 2480 reviews

100% Plagiarism Free & Custom Written - Tailored to Your Instructions

Case Study #1: Engineering Ethics and Ethical Decision-Making and Judgments



General Information:

Engineering ethics refers to the set of principles and moral guidelines that govern the conduct of engineers in their professional practice. It involves making decisions and judgments that prioritize the well-being of society, the environment, and individuals while upholding integrity and responsibility. Ethical decision-making in engineering involves evaluating complex dilemmas, considering the potential consequences of choices, and adhering to codes of ethics established by professional organizations. Engineers must weigh technical feasibility against ethical considerations, ensuring their work aligns with safety, sustainability, and social values. Ethical judgments play a pivotal role in engineering, guiding professionals in navigating the ethical challenges and moral responsibilities inherent in their field.


Case Study Description:

In this case sFtudy, the students in groups are required to prepare a report (minimum of 1,000 words).

The report is required to be in Microsoft Word format – handwritten assignments will not be accepted. A maximum of five students can submit one report with writing clearly the contribution and role of each student in completing the assignment.

A cover page containing names and students’ numbers, course number, course name and date submitted is required.

Assignments should be uploaded to D2L before the due date. Emailed assignments will not be accepted.

Answer each question separately and at the end of each secondary information you must include citations for the reference in APA format. List of references should be added to the end of assignment.

Plagiarism is strictly prohibited, if anyone copies from another group or “copy and paste” from external source it will be automatically counted as “ZERO”.

Using the References provided in D2L and/or other research resources such as the internet and library to complete the following:

  1. What is the difference between ethical issues and ethical dilemmas?
  2. Select an engineering ethical case study (issue or dilemma)?
  3. Apply problem solving techniques to solve the selected ethical issue/dilemma by using the steps in any “Framework for Ethical Decision Making” shown in the provided power-point in the D2L or any of other frameworks, which can be obtained from the internet such as the one shown in the appendix attached to the end of this assignment.
  4. Many philosophers, ethicists, and theologians have suggested a variety of different frameworks (lenses) that help us perceive ethical dimensions and make ethical decision, please watch the following video:
  5. To complete this assignment, please watch the following video for a sample assignment:
  6. For evaluating the three alternative actions, please use three of Ethical Frameworks (lenses) for each alternative as in the sample assignment to test each alternative solution (action).
  7. Conclusions (Implement Your Decision and Reflect on the Outcome)


Method of Delivery (Final Report) and Timeline:

The final report submission is on October 26th (Thursday). Please check the paper template document for a detailed information about the case study content and sections. Similarity index (< 10%). 




The term case study total score is 10 out of 100 as per the course syllabus.


Expected Learning Outcomes:

  • Familiar with the research methods, teamwork, communication, and report writing skills.
  • Describe and recognize basic concepts of ethics, professional practice, human values, ethical behaviour and legal responsibilities in Engineering situations.
  • Apply ethical decision-making and judgments, which must consider the impact of engineering solutions in global, economic, environmental, and societal contexts.




Appendix from the following website:

A Framework for Ethical Decision Making


Making Decisions

Making good ethical decisions requires a trained sensitivity to ethical issues and a practiced method for exploring the ethical aspects of a decision and weighing the considerations that should impact our choice of a course of action. Having a method for ethical decision-making is essential. When practiced regularly, the method becomes so familiar that we work through it automatically without consulting the specific steps.

The more novel and difficult the ethical choice we face, the more we need to rely on discussion and dialogue with others about the dilemma. Only by careful exploration of the problem, aided by the insights and different perspectives of others, can we make good ethical choices in such situations.

The following framework for ethical decision-making is intended to serve as a practical tool for exploring ethical dilemmas and identifying ethical courses of action.


Identify the Ethical Issues

  1. Could this decision or situation be damaging to someone or to some group, or unevenly beneficial to people? Does this decision involve a choice between a good and bad alternative, or perhaps between two “goods” or between two “bads”?
  2. Is this issue about more than solely what is legal or what is most efficient? If so, how?

Get the Facts

  1. What are the relevant facts of the case? What facts are not known? Can I learn more about the situation? Do I know enough to make a decision?
  2. What individuals and groups have an important stake in the outcome? Are the concerns of some of those individuals or groups more important? Why?
  3. What are the options for acting? Have all the relevant persons and groups been consulted? Have I identified creative options?

Evaluate Alternative Actions

  1. Evaluate the options by asking the following questions:
  • Which option best respects the rights of all who have a stake? (The Rights Lens)
  • Which option treats people fairly, giving them each what they are due? (The Justice Lens)
  • Which option will produce the most good and do the least harm for as many stakeholders as possible? (The Utilitarian Lens)
  • Which option best serves the community as a whole, not just some members? (The Common Good Lens)
  • Which option leads me to act as the sort of person I want to be? (The Virtue Lens)
  • Which option appropriately takes into account the relationships, concerns, and feelings of all stakeholders? (The Care Ethics Lens)

Choose an Option for Action and Test It

  1. After an evaluation using all of these lenses, which option best addresses the situation?
  2. If I told someone I respect (or a public audience) which option I have chosen, what would they say?
  3. How can my decision be implemented with the greatest care and attention to the concerns of all stakeholders?

Implement Your Decision and Reflect on the Outcome

  1. How did my decision turn out, and what have I learned from this specific situation? What (if any) follow-up actions should I take?

This framework for thinking ethically is the product of dialogue and debate at the Markkula Center for Applied Ethics at Santa Clara University. Primary contributors include Manuel Velasquez, Dennis Moberg, Michael J. Meyer, Thomas Shanks, Margaret R. McLean, David DeCosse, Claire André, Kirk O. Hanson, Irina Raicu, and Jonathan Kwan. It was last revised on November 5, 2021.


Six Ethical Lenses

If our ethical decision-making is not solely based on feelings, religion, law, accepted social practice, or science, then on what basis can we decide between right and wrong, good and bad? Many philosophers, ethicists, and theologians have helped us answer this critical question. They have suggested a variety of different lenses that help us perceive ethical dimensions. Here are six of them:

The Rights Lens

Some suggest that the ethical action is the one that best protects and respects the moral rights of those affected. This approach starts from the belief that humans have a dignity based on their human nature per se or on their ability to choose freely what they do with their lives. On the basis of such dignity, they have a right to be treated as ends in themselves and not merely as means to other ends. The list of moral rights—including the rights to make one`s own choices about what kind of life to lead, to be told the truth, not to be injured, to a degree of privacy, and so on—is widely debated; some argue that non-humans have rights, too. Rights are also often understood as implying duties—in particular, the duty to respect others` rights and dignity.

(For further elaboration on the rights lens, please see our essay, “Rights.”)

The Justice Lens

Justice is the idea that each person should be given their due, and what people are due is often interpreted as fair or equal treatment. Equal treatment implies that people should be treated as equals according to some defensible standard such as merit or need, but not necessarily that everyone should be treated in the exact same way in every respect. There are different types of justice that address what people are due in various contexts. These include social justice (structuring the basic institutions of society), distributive justice (distributing benefits and burdens), corrective justice (repairing past injustices), retributive justice (determining how to appropriately punish wrongdoers), and restorative or transformational justice (restoring relationships or transforming social structures as an alternative to criminal punishment).

(For further elaboration on the justice lens, please see our essay, “Justice and Fairness.”)

The Utilitarian Lens

Some ethicists begin by asking, “How will this action impact everyone affected?”—emphasizing the consequences of our actions. Utilitarianism, a results-based approach, says that the ethical action is the one that produces the greatest balance of good over harm for as many stakeholders as possible. It requires an accurate determination of the likelihood of a particular result and its impact. For example, the ethical corporate action, then, is the one that produces the greatest good and does the least harm for all who are affected—customers, employees, shareholders, the community, and the environment. Cost/benefit analysis is another consequentialist approach.

(For further elaboration on the utilitarian lens, please see our essay, “Calculating Consequences.”)

The Common Good Lens

According to the common good approach, life in community is a good in itself and our actions should contribute to that life. This approach suggests that the interlocking relationships of society are the basis of ethical reasoning and that respect and compassion for all others—especially the vulnerable—are requirements of such reasoning. This approach also calls attention to the common conditions that are important to the welfare of everyone—such as clean air and water, a system of laws, effective police and fire departments, health care, a public educational system, or even public recreational areas. Unlike the utilitarian lens, which sums up and aggregates goods for every individual, the common good lens highlights mutual concern for the shared interests of all members of a community.

(For further elaboration on the common good lens, please see our essay, “The Common Good.”)

The Virtue Lens

A very ancient approach to ethics argues that ethical actions ought to be consistent with certain ideal virtues that provide for the full development of our humanity. These virtues are dispositions and habits that enable us to act according to the highest potential of our character and on behalf of values like truth and beauty. Honesty, courage, compassion, generosity, tolerance, love, fidelity, integrity, fairness, self-control, and prudence are all examples of virtues. Virtue ethics asks of any action, “What kind of person will I become if I do this?” or “Is this action consistent with my acting at my best?”

(For further elaboration on the virtue lens, please see our essay, “Ethics and Virtue.”)

The Care Ethics Lens

Care ethics is rooted in relationships and in the need to listen and respond to individuals in their specific circumstances, rather than merely following rules or calculating utility. It privileges the flourishing of embodied individuals in their relationships and values interdependence, not just independence. It relies on empathy to gain a deep appreciation of the interest, feelings, and viewpoints of each stakeholder, employing care, kindness, compassion, generosity, and a concern for others to resolve ethical conflicts. Care ethics holds that options for resolution must account for the relationships, concerns, and feelings of all stakeholders. Focusing on connecting intimate interpersonal duties to societal duties, an ethics of care might counsel, for example, a more holistic approach to public health policy that considers food security, transportation access, fair wages, housing support, and environmental protection alongside physical health.

(Our essay elaborating further on the care ethics lens is forthcoming.)

Using the Lenses

Each of the lenses introduced above helps us determine what standards of behavior and character traits can be considered right and good. There are still problems to be solved, however.

The first problem is that we may not agree on the content of some of these specific lenses. For example, we may not all agree on the same set of human and civil rights. We may not agree on what constitutes the common good. We may not even agree on what is a good and what is a harm.

The second problem is that the different lenses may lead to different answers to the question “What is ethical?” Nonetheless, each one gives us important insights in the process of deciding what is ethical in a particular circumstance.

Price: £119

100% Plagiarism Free & Custom Written - Tailored to Your Instructions