|
Criteria
|
HD => 85%
|
DI 75-84%
|
CR 65-74%
|
PS 50-64%
|
|
RS1
Choose a capstone project topic and identify the information needed to fill knowledge gaps stated by others.
10.00%
|
Project Proposal and Plan demonstrates that an evaluation of recent trends in emerging technologies and the identification of the knowledge gap has led to an appropriate and detailed topic selection.
8.50 to 10.00%
|
Project Proposal and Plan demonstrates that an evaluation of recent trends in emerging technologies and the identification of the knowledge gap has led to an appropriate topic selection.
7.50 to 8.49%
|
Project Proposal and Plan demonstrates that an evaluation of recent trends in emerging technologies but the identification of the knowledge gap was not clear in the topic selection.
6.50 to 7.49%
|
Project Proposal and Plan demonstrates a rationale that is not clear and the project has no clear identification of the knowledge gap or recommendations by any sponsor or supervisor.
5.00 to 6.49%
|
|
Project scope, methodology, presentation and project management tools and techniques used
30.00%
|
Proposal is well written with no grammatical or spelling errors has evidence that is has been reviewed at least once. Project Scope, Methodology and all project management tools and techniques are included, such as timeline, WBS, Gantt chart, All sections in the proposal and plan are clearly set our for the reader.
25.50 to 30.00%
|
Proposal is well written with only a few grammatical or spelling errors and has evidence that is has been reviewed at least once. Project Scope, Methodology and all project management tools and techniques are mostly included, such as timeline, WBS, Gantt chart, The proposal and plan overall are clearly set our for the reader.
22.50 to 25.49%
|
Proposal is well written with several grammatical or spelling errors but have no evidence that is has been reviewed. Project Scope, Methodology and all project management tools and techniques are mostly included, such as timeline, WBS, Gantt chart, Most sections in the proposal and plan are clearly set our for the reader.
19.50 to 22.49%
|
Proposal is not well written with many grammatical or spelling errors and no evidence that is has been reviewed. Project Scope, Methodology and a project management tool was used, but not all techniques are complete such the timeline, WBS or Gantt chart, Further refinement of the proposal and plan are expected.
15.00 to 19.49%
|
|
Practicality of the resources, a realistic timeline and the deliverables in the proposed solution.
20.00%
|
Proposed solution demonstrates full understanding of real-world constraints and the timeline in WBS and Gantt chart specifies due dates for required deliverables. Materials list is reasonable, given resources. Proposal clearly links the problem to the proposed solution.
17.00 to 20.00%
|
Proposed solution demonstrates a good understanding of real-world constraints and the timeline in WBS and Gantt chart specifies most due dates for required deliverables. Materials list is mostly reasonable, given resources. Proposal does link to the problem to the proposed solution.
15.00 to 16.99%
|
Proposed solution demonstrates a poor understanding of real-world constraints and the timeline in WBS and Gantt chart is brief and only specifies some of the due dates for required deliverables. Materials list is lacking details, given resources. Proposal makes very little connection between the proposed solution and the problem.
13.00 to 14.99%
|
Proposed solution is too general or incomplete in places and demonstrates a lack of understanding of real-world constraints. The WBS and Gantt chart are too generic or missing and only specifies some of the due dates for required deliverables. Materials list is not given. Proposal makes no connection between the proposed solution and the problem.
10.00 to 12.99%
|
|
RA
Synthesize and apply information and data to different contexts to facilitate critical thinking, planning, problem solving and decision making, understanding of the problem and consideration of users.
30.00%
|
Identifies strengths and weaknesses in own thinking: recognizes personal assumptions, values and perspectives, compares to others’, and evaluates them in the context of alternate points of view.
25.50 to 30.00%
|
Identifies strengths and weaknesses in own thinking: recognizes personal assumptions, values and perspectives, compares to others’, with some comparisons of alternate points of view.
22.50 to 25.49%
|
Identifies some personal assumptions, values, and perspectives;
recognizes some assumptions, values and perspectives of others; shallow comparisons of alternate points of view.
19.50 to 22.49%
|
Identifies some personal assumptions, values, and perspectives;
does not consider alternate points of view.
15.00 to 19.49%
|
|
Timeliness and completion of project proposal and plan.
10.00%
|
All required elements of the project proposal and plan are completed and produced on time.
8.50 to 10.00%
|
Most of required elements of the project proposal and plan are produced on time.
7.50 to 8.49%
|
Only a few required elements of the project proposal and plan are completed and produced on time.
6.50 to 7.49%
|
Not all required elements of the project proposal and plan are completed or produced on time.
5.00 to 6.49%
|
