The Spandrels of San Marco

Qualified Writers
Rated 4.9/5 based on 2480 reviews

100% Plagiarism Free & Custom Written - Tailored to Your Instructions

The Spandrels of San Marco

INSTRUCTIONS:
Dear Writer, The following points must be included in the critique summary: 1. Why was the study conducted, or why was the paper written? What gaps in knowledge or understanding was it intended to fill? 2. What hypotheses were tasted or what research was reviewed? 3. What are the results or conclusions? 4. Who do the results or conclusions shed light on broader issues? 5. What questions did the paper raised for you? 6. What potential methodological problems or flaws in reasoning did you notice? 7. What are some alternative interpretations of the results? 8. Other comets. Please make sure that the sentences are short, simple and direct. Thanks.
CONTENT:
Running head: LIFE SCIENCESArticle critiqueName:University:Course:Tutor:Date: Aim of conducting the studyIn the article by Gould S.J and Lewontin R.C, the aim of conducting the study was to put forth a criticism of the program of adaptation. The program of adaptation was based on natural selection in which case faith was used as the optimizing agent and failed to distinguish origin reasons from current utility. The program is criticized by emphasizing competing notion, in which case organisms compete for resources for their survival. There was intention of expressing the fact that survival of organisms is through competition for resources rather than adapting to their environment.Hypothesis which were testedThe hypothesis of the study was that survival of organisms depended on how effective they were in competing for necessary resources for surviv...

Price: £99

100% Plagiarism Free & Custom Written - Tailored to Your Instructions