Overview
This assessment item requires you to use the two organisations from your preliminary work (first assignment). You have provided a profile of these organisations. This now forms a base for the next assessment. Taking into consideration the reasons why you selected these organisations that you described in your preliminary work, you now need to describe business communication network-related elements in your research paper.
Background
In the first assignment you already provided information what you should consider about the potential set up of these organisations network-related elements, including the size and type of organisation.
Using the course material you are now required to make further assumptions and write an industry research paper that will describe the business communications and business systems relying on the network-related elements of these two organisations. While the textbook provides you with technical information of network operation, you need to take the higher level view of how the networks can provide and help the management of the organisations. You need to differentiate the use of the networks between these two organisations. A larger organisation would have more complexity due to the factors outlined in the first assignment specifications. A smaller organisation may not have the necessary infrastructure as one would expect.
You need to familiarise yourself further with these two organisations and create an understanding how they would conduct their business (email, network connectivity), local or global, small family business. Consider that different types of businesses even in the same sector might have different requirements. Determine if the organisation is owned by another (this information may be available on the internet) and how that might have an impact on the use and design of communications in the organisations. Some of your assumptions can be based on what you may already know about an organisation. As you do your research, online, journal articles, or books, use the information from your reading to build support and arguments using Harvard citing.
Once you have built up a picture of these organisations network usage and design, you will then have integrated the course material in your description while focusing on the specifics of each organisation. You are not required to contact anyone from these organisations.
Structure of Industry Research Paper
Using the USQ library search facility to locate suitable journal papers will provide you with a good understanding on how a paper is written. The focus here is not so much that you write a journal article, but that you write a document that applies the structure given below, and address the issues outlined in this specification. We are particularly looking for you to apply the course material to your description of the network-related elements. You need to show your understanding of the material, while describing each organisations network. This will result in unique content.
Organise your research paper in the following way:
- Title (you are required to provide your paper’s title)
- Your name and student number
- Abstract (about 100 words)
- Introduction
- Body context (you could divide into several sub-sections if required)
- Conclusion
The word-count limit for the introduction, body, and conclusion of this paper is set at about 3,000 words. It is part of the assessment that you meet this word count, as it will require you to address the specifications succinctly. Use five (5) or more resources for you Harvard in text citing and reference list. Please ensure that you apply the format correctly, and for your convenience, links to resources have been provided.
Submission Requirements
Submit your assignment into EASE. Please note that the link will be visible to you only when the assignment is due. Do not email the essay to the course leader. If you are unable to upload, notify the course leader of the issue so that it may be resolved so that you can upload the assessment.
Marking Criteria
Student name: ___________________________ Student number: ____________________
|
|
|
Marks
|
|
Structured development of research paper
|
|
|
|
|
Logical flow leading the reader from start to finish on a clear path of addressing the assignment; clear identification and description of network usage; clearly differentiation of networks between the two organisations as outlined in the specification.
|
Meets all the requires for this objective
|
15-20
|
|
Good work – minor issue
|
10-15
|
|
Requires more work
|
5-10
|
|
Very poor effort
|
0-5
|
|
Comment:
|
|
|
/30
|
|
Depth of research/ critical reflection
|
|
|
|
|
Reason to support findings: critical evaluation and analysis of the two organisations networks usingbook, journal article, report, news article on the internet); using sources to support description of the network-related elements of these two organisations.
|
Meets all the requires for this objective
|
15-20
|
|
Good work – minor issue
|
10-15
|
|
Requires more work
|
5-10
|
|
Very poor effort
|
0-5
|
|
Comment:
|
|
|
/30
|
|
Understanding of key ideas and concepts
|
|
|
|
|
Understood the course material; able to identify key ideas and concept within a real life scenario of issues; able to explain an issue with the use of key ideas and concepts; able to relate own experience to course material and issue by introducing own perspective; showing judgement by incorporating objective view of how implementing a concept may not work and providing suggestions on how this could be overcome.
|
Meets all the requires for this objective
|
15-20
|
|
Good work – minor issue
|
10-15
|
|
Requires more work
|
5-10
|
|
Very poor effort
|
0-5
|
|
Comment:
|
|
|
/30
|
|
Evidence of support
|
|
|
|
|
Citing and referencing: Correct format used for within text Harvard citing; correct format used for Harvard reference list; used more than five (5) sources (book, journal article, report, news article on the internet) in addition to the course text book.
|
Meets all the requires for this objective
|
15-20
|
|
Good work – minor issue
|
10-15
|
|
Requires more work
|
5-10
|
|
Very poor effort
|
0-5
|
|
Comment:
|
|
|
/10
|
|
Total
|
|
/100
|
