Endurace Running and the Evolution of Homo
Dear Writer, The following points must be included in the critique: 1. Why was the study conducted, or why was the paper written? What gaps in knowledge or understanding was it intended to fill? 2. What hypotheses were tasted or what research was reviewed? 3. What are the results or conclusions? 4. Who do the results or conclusions shed light on broader issues? 5. What questions did the paper raised for you? 6. What potential methodological problems or flaws in reasoning did you notice? 7. What are some alternative interpretations of the results? 8. Other comets. Please make sure that the sentences are short, simple and direct. Thanks.
Running Head: ARTICLE CRITIQUE Endurance running and the evolution of Homo Name: Institution: Course: Tutor: Date: Endurance running and the evolution of Homo The aim of the study was to evaluate the evidence for and the impact of endurance running (ER) in human evolution. The study begins by discussing the mechanical differences between running and walking and the way humans perform well in ER compared to other animals. It seeks to evaluate what is known concerning key structural specialization in human ER capabilities and if these features evolved for bipedal wa...